UN special Rapporteur: UN special reporters comment on Kashmir issue .. India responds in kind! – india rejects a special rapporteurs over jammu and kashmir remarks


  • UN envoy feedback on Kashmir issue.
  • India responds to criticism.
  • Benefit to Kashmiris with the repeal of Article 370.

India has responded to UN Special Rapporteurs’ criticism of the revocation of special standing to Jammu and Kashmir. Jammu and Kashmir has made it clear that India is an inner affair and can’t be remoted. Fernando de Virennes, a spokesman for minority affairs on the United Nations, and Ahmad Shahid, a spokesman for non secular freedom, criticized the repeal of Article 370, which provides special standing to Jammu and Kashmir. The remarks have been made as a part of a press launch revealed on the web site of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.

Responding to this, Foreign Ministry spokesman Anurag Srivastava mentioned, “It is unlucky that this press launch was issued through the go to of a overseas delegation to Jammu and Kashmir.” “The press launch ignores the truth that Jammu and Kashmir is an integral a part of India. The determination was taken by the Indian Parliament on August 5, 2019 to revoke the special standing of Jammu and Kashmir and make it a Union Territory,” he mentioned.

Srivastava commented that placing an finish to a long time of discrimination, he had efficiently introduced democracy to the sector degree and ignored the problems of native election administration and good governance to district growth councils. He lamented how the legal guidelines relevant to different components of India utilized to Jammu and Kashmir, giving the folks there the identical rights as these in different components of the nation and ignoring this constructive impact.

UN human rights specialists have expressed concern over India’s determination to repeal the autonomy of Jammu and Kashmir and enact new legal guidelines that might cut back the political participation of Muslims and different minorities in the nation.

Srivastava questioned that the Human Rights Council should adhere to the Special Reporters’ perspective of impartiality and neutrality, however that their assertion was on the contrary. “We hope the Special Rapporteurs will develop a correct understanding of the problems below their scrutiny and chorus from making hasty conclusions and issuing press releases,” he mentioned.

Source link