Vivek Oberoi’s Valentine’s Day video lands him in trouble as cops fine him for riding bike without helmet

Vivek Oberoi didn’t put on a helmet whereas he was riding a bike. Moreover, the actor and his spouse have additionally been accused of flouting COVID-19 norms by not sporting masks.

Vivek Oberoi’s Valentine’s Day video lands him in trouble as cops fine him for riding bike without helmet

Trouble mounted for Vivek Oberoi after the Mumbai Police issued an e-challan to the actor for riding a bike without a helmet. It so occurred that Meenu Varghese, a social activist had requested Maharashtra Home Minister Anil Deshmukh and the state police to take motion in opposition to Oberoi for violation of visitors guidelines. As a consequence, the Santacruz visitors police have fined him over the identical. On the opposite hand, Varghese re-shared the video on social media which was earlier shared by him.

Vivek had posted this specific video on his social media handles on Valentine’s Day in which he bought a brand new bike. Not solely that however he may very well be seen riding the car together with his spouse throughout the evening. However, he didn’t put on a helmet whereas doing so which finally landed him in trouble. Earlier, he wrote in his caption, “What a start of this lovely valentine”s day with Main, Meri patni aur woh! A refreshing joyride indeed!”

Check out the video beneath:

According to a report by PTI, the visitors police have penalized Rs 500 to the actor for having shared a video of himself in which he rode a bike without a helmet. Moreover, Vivek and his spouse had been additionally discovered flouting the current COVID-19 norms as neither of them was seen sporting a masks in the video which has now gone viral on the web owing to the aforementioned information. Earlier, quite a few followers of the actor had additionally urged him to put on a helmet the subsequent time he takes a journey.

Also Read: Vivek Oberoi opens up on Bollywood lobbying: Have seen it firsthand how individuals abuse their energy


Your remark has been submitted to the moderation queue



Source link